Verification-first legal research

Every citation checked.
Before it hits the brief.

AI-powered legal research that cross-checks every citation against court records. Built for litigators who carry personal malpractice exposure and can't afford to file bad law.

No credit card required. No Westlaw or Lexis subscription needed.

In private beta with solo and small-firm litigators

PIPersonal injury
CLCivil litigation
FLFamily law
EPEstate planning
Encrypted at rest & in transit
Federal + 50 state coverage
Full audit trails
CourtListener integration

The problem

One bad citation can end a case.
Or a career.

Courts are sanctioning attorneys for AI-hallucinated citations. Standing orders now require AI disclosure. Solo practitioners carry personal malpractice exposure on every filing. You need a verification layer between AI output and your signature block.

Capabilities

Research. Verify. Organize.

Three tools. One workflow. Zero hallucinated citations.

3 citations

2 verified · 1 caution

Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 (1954)

99%

Smith v. Acme Corp., 892 F.3d 1140 (9th Cir. 2018)

97%

Doe v. Roe, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)

Treatment

Citation Verification

Paste any brief or memo. Every citation is extracted, parsed, and checked against authoritative court records. You get a confidence score, negative treatment alerts, and a step-by-step verification log.

Comprehensive verification data per citation

What is the standard for summary judgment in the 9th Circuit?

A movant must show no genuine dispute as to any material fact[1]; the court draws all inferences in the non-movant's favor[2].

9th Cir. · Federal

3 sources · verified

AI Legal Research

Ask questions in plain language. Get jurisdiction-aware answers backed by real case law — not hallucinated citations. Every result links to its source.

Federal courts + all 50 states via CourtListener

Smith v. Acme Corp.

8 citations · 2 queries

Active

Doe Estate planning

3 citations · 1 query

Active

ABC Co. compliance memo

12 citations · 5 queries

Closed

Matter Organization

Tie research and verification reports to specific matters. Track your work by case and export PDF verification reports for your files.

Full case lifecycle tracking

How it works

From paste to verified in minutes

01

Paste your text

Drop in a brief, motion, or any legal document. StareLaw extracts every citation automatically.

02

Automated verification

Each citation is checked against court records. You see valid, caution, and invalid statuses with confidence scores.

03

File with confidence

Download a verification report. Every citation is accounted for, every source is linked, every treatment is flagged.

Sources

Built on the public record.

Verification draws from authoritative federal and state court records — not from a model's training data. When a citation resolves, you can click through to the source.

Premium reporter integrations rolling out by tier in Q3 2026.

Federal

Supreme Court of the United States

Federal

13 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals

Federal

U.S. District Courts

Federal

U.S. Bankruptcy Courts

State

50 State Supreme Courts

State

State Appellate Courts

Public

CourtListener / RECAP

Public

Caselaw Access Project

Coming soon

Premium reporters

“We're collecting testimonials from the design partner cohort now. The first will land here.”

Design partner cohort, Q3 2026. Apply for early access →

Trust & security

Built for attorneys. Secured like client data.

Your data stays yours

Never used for model training. Encrypted at rest and in transit.

Federal + 50 states

Comprehensive court coverage via CourtListener and expanding premium sources.

Verification logging

Every verification step is logged and visible. Export PDF reports for your files.

SOC 2 in progress

Type I targeted Q3 2026. Security details →

Why we built this

SL

StareLaw founders

Builder note

The legal world doesn't need faster AI. It needs AI that can't lie to a judge.

Solo and small-firm litigators carry personal malpractice exposure on every filing. A hallucinated citation isn't a product defect — it's a sanctioned-by-name-in-a-published-opinion problem. Every general-purpose model will eventually make one up. None of them can verify themselves.

StareLaw is the verification layer that sits between AI output and your signature block. Every citation is cross-checked against authoritative court records before it ever reaches the page. Confidence is shown, treatments are flagged, sources are linked. If a case doesn't resolve, you find out before the judge does.

We built this for the attorney who reads every footnote themselves anyway. We're just giving them a faster way to be right.

Pricing

Transparent pricing. No contracts.

No hidden fees. Cancel anytime. Start with a 30-day free trial — no credit card required.

Starter

Solo practitioners

$99/month
  • AI legal research with verified citations
  • Citation verification (unlimited)
  • PDF verification reports
  • Email support
  • Bluebook citation formattingsoon
  • Brief section draftingsoon
  • Practice-area calibrationsoon
Most Popular

Professional

Small firms (2–5 attorneys)

$249/month
  • Everything in Starter
  • Unlimited research & verification
  • Matter organization
  • Priority support
  • Full brief section draftingsoon
  • Practice-area tone calibrationsoon

Firm

Firms (5–10 attorneys)

$399/month
  • Everything in Professional
  • Dedicated support
  • Team collaborationsoon
  • Firm knowledge basesoon
  • Analytics dashboardsoon
  • Clio integrationsoon

All plans include a 30-day free trial. No credit card required. View full comparison

Stop filing blind.

Every citation in your next brief can be verified before it reaches the court. Start your free trial today — no credit card required.